Did she, in fact, deserve the prize?
1 hour ago
Actress Kim Go Eun received the biggest individual honor of the night at the 5th Blue Dragon Series Awards, but the awards ceremony’s explanation for her victory quickly became almost as debated as the result itself.
Here Are All The Winners Of The “5th Blue Dragon Series Awards”
The actress took home the Daesang following an unusually prolific stretch across three major streaming dramas. Kim led You and Everything Else, The Price of Confession, and Yumi’s Cells 3 within a single awards season, portraying characters that differed dramatically in personality, genre, and emotional tone. For many viewers, her ability to move between the three roles without allowing them to overlap made her an obvious choice for the ceremony’s highest honor.
However, the official reasoning behind the award drew a more divided response.
According to the statement explaining Kim’s selection, the Daesang win recognized her work leading three major OTT series in a single season while portraying a completely different character in each production. The statement also credited her with helping all three projects achieve success.
The Daesang went to Kim Go Eun, who led major OTT series including You And Everything Else, The Price of Confession, and Yumi’s Cells 3 within a single season, showing completely different characters in each project and helping guide them all to success. She established an unprecedented and complete record across male actors, female actors, and the productions themselves. There were many voices calling for the recognition of Kim Go Eun’s contribution to driving the entire streaming ecosystem, and she was named the undisputed recipient of the Daesang.
— Blue Dragon
The first half of the explanation was widely praised. Even among viewers who questioned the final decision, many acknowledged that Kim had delivered three accomplished performances within a relatively short period. The dispute instead centered on the phrase “driving the entire streaming ecosystem.” Some netizens felt that the wording greatly overstated the commercial and cultural impact of the projects. They argued that appearing in several major series, even while acting exceptionally well, was not necessarily the same as transforming or advancing the streaming market itself.
One commenter compared the claim to the influence of Squid Game, suggesting that such sweeping language should be reserved for a title that measurably changed the global OTT landscape. Another viewer pointed out that Kim had worked with already-established platforms rather than smaller services whose fortunes might reasonably have changed because of her involvement.
- 736. When you say someone drove the OTT ecosystem, that should mean something like Squid Game. Are they giving it to her because she appeared in a lot of projects?
- 737. I watched two of the projects, and she acted incredibly well in both. The characters were completely different too. I fully acknowledge the win.
- 738. Kim Go Eun absolutely deserved the Daesang.
- 739. What??? Two of the three projects were closer to failures, so how did she supposedly drive the ecosystem? The industry people and the fans in these comments are incredibly biased. Even the commenters know that explanation makes no sense, so they are just blindly going on about her acting instead.
- 740. I agree though.
- 741. I subscribed to TVING to watch Yumi’s Cells 3, LOL.
- 742. [Deleted Comment]
- 743. It is not like she worked on smaller OTT platforms, so saying she contributed enough to drive the entire OTT ecosystem is a bit much.
The criticism was therefore not necessarily aimed at Kim’s acting or even the trophy itself. Rather, some viewers felt that Blue Dragon had taken a strong and understandable argument about artistic range and inflated it into a questionable claim about industry-wide influence. Kim’s supporters pushed back against the suggestion that she had been rewarded merely for completing a large number of projects. They argued that the official statement clearly emphasized the quality and variety of her performances, not simply the volume of her work.
- 871. I was deeply impressed by You and Everything Else and The Price of Confession. She seems to be in the best form of her career. Congratulations.
- 872. She did three projects and acted insanely well in all three. It is incredible that she took on such different roles in such a short period and excelled in each.
- 873. They were all good. Kim Go Eun obviously deserved the Daesang.
- 874. I watched Yumi’s Cells, and now I can’t see anyone else as Yumi but Kim Go Eun, LOL. She does not feel like an actress performing a role. She simply becomes the character.
- 875. She is so good.
- 876. She has done many projects, but she has never once acted poorly. Instead, she proved that she can handle any genre.
- 877. What do people mean when they say she received it because she had many projects? The point is that she portrayed a range of characters exceptionally well across many projects.
- 878. The projects were released only months apart, but none of the roles felt repetitive, and I never saw the face of her previous character in the next one. That is what she did well.
- 879. Her acting was unbelievably good, and the characters never felt like they overlapped.
What do you think? Was Kim Go Eun’s range across three major series enough to justify the Daesang, or did Blue Dragon overstate her impact on the OTT industry?
Read more:
Kim Go Eun Reveals The Unexpected Real-Life Tragedy That Inspired Her Netflix Performance